Sunday, November 02, 2008

Blocked Out


Yale's Bobby Abare made some big hits


Yale 27 Columbia 12


Why Yale Won

Yale was unable to get much going on offense, but they were strong on defense, sepecial teams and played error-free football overall. The Bulldogs rarely looked the Columbia gifthorses in the mouth, scoring their first 24 points on drives totaling just 83 yards.


Why Columbia Lost

In contrast to the Elis, the Lions moved the ball on several long drives, but had to settle for two field goals early in the game and then started making crucial turnovers later on. While dominating overall, the Columbia defense did blow two coverages on a pair of long passes that helped set up Eli scores.


Key Turning Points

1) After stopping the Yale defense on two consecutive three-and-outs, the Elis thrid possession began at their own 48 and Yale mixed things up with a long pass to a too-wide-open Peter Balsam that went for 35 yards. Two Mike McLeod runs later and it was 7-3 Yale.

2) Down 7-3, the Lions began a drive at their own 8 an drive all the way down to the Yale 5 as M.A. Olawale mixed the pass and the run brilliantly. But the drive fizzled right there and Columbia had to settle for another field goal rather than taking the lead.

3) On Columbia's next possession and the score still 7-6, a host of Yale defenders broke through the middle of the Lions line and blocked on Rocholl's punt deep in th Lion end. That gave Yale a gift TD as the Elis began at the Columbia 2.

4) Trailing 14-6 at the half, the Lions first two possessions of the third quarter were disastrous. The first possession was a three-and-out, and a freak 15-yad punt gave the Elis the ball at the Columbia 25. The second possession ended with an Olawale fumble that gave Yale the ball at the Lion 19. Yale scored 10 points off those turnovers and had a 24-6 comfortable lead.


There were obviously some good moments for Columbia in a game that had the Lions winning most of the statistical battles:

Mike McLeod scored three short TD's, but the Columbia defense hld him to a mediocre 85 yards on 23 carries.

Both Olawale and Shane Kelly had their moments. Olawale ripped off a 44-yard run early in the game that set up the Lions first field goal. Olawale passed well overall, shaking off an early deep bomb that was intercepted and finishing up going 13-for-18 for 109 yards. Kelly had some good runs too, including a 10-yard TD run, and he went 5-for-6 for 83 yards. Both did have costly fumbles on scrambles, however.

Lou Miller was ejected from the game in the fourth quarter for an apparent late hit out of bounds, but before that he again was a frequent visitor to the opponent backfield, including back-to-back solo tackles for no gain on Mike McLeod on Yale's first possession.

It was another nice game for Ray Rangel, who had 46 yards on 10 carries.

Alex Gross had 8 tackles, a number of them in the open field.

Phil Mitchell finally got his first solo sack of the season.

Kalasi Huggins made a great play to break up a Yale pass in the corner of the Columbia end zone late in the game. Huggins seems fully recovered from his week 3 injury.

Nico Gutierrez finally hd his first catch of the season as he returned to his home state of Connecticut. It was only for 5 yards, but he held on to the ball after taking a vicious shot from Travis Henry.

Austin Knowlin was more of a factor, getting 5 catches for 40 yards in the game. It's a small step in the right direction.

In a weird moment before the second half kickoff, both teams somehow ended up barking at each other from opposing hash marks on the field. The Hartford Courant later reported that Columbia somehow started it by making some comments to Bobby Abare, but luckily nothing else but words were exchanged.

8 Comments:

At Sun Nov 02, 10:35:00 PM GMT+7, Blogger dabull said...

The Lions again showed that physically they can now matchup and compete with anyone in the league yet continue to give games away with bad turnovers and special teams mistakes.

 
At Mon Nov 03, 02:09:00 AM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agree with dabull's short summary, but might add that the absence of a running back with breakaway speed is continuing to hurt us on offense as our only big play guys are the two quarterbacks and you can't expect them to do it alone and to get into the end zone by themselves. Rangel and Davis are o.k., but neither one has the blazing speed to break away for very big yardage, or the size to wear down the defense. I know it's late in the season, but we really need to do something to improve our running game. However, this loss was primarily the fault of the special teams, particularly on punts/punt returns. Obviously, there are major problems with the punting/receiving game that need to be rectified before next Saturday. Finally, the good news is that the Columbia Defense clearly earned an "A" grade for the third consecutive week. Way to go defense!

 
At Mon Nov 03, 06:09:00 AM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Use Kelly at quarterback and Olawale at tailback and you've got something. But only if they can hold onto the dadburn football. Olawale would lead the Ivy League in rushing and have opposing defenses running for cover in the fourth quarter. The guy is a bull.

 
At Mon Nov 03, 10:43:00 AM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Offense: B- Outplayed Yale in most significant offensive categories and won the trench. However 3 big turnovers negates a lot of good. We need to improve in the red zone. Both Olawale and Kelly showed moxy but they gotta keep it off the carpet, simple as that. What happened 82 on Saturday? he needed a few balls if for no other reason than to open up some other routes. Still though, looked like we missed a couple in the pattern that would have gone for 6. Goal for next week: no fumbles, no delay of game penalties.

Defense: B This group has continued to improve and played well against a good Yale offense. Once again this week we played well, played well and then gave up the big play. We seemed committed to stopping the run which we did well. The first half really revolved around a couple of plays, one a big miss in the secondary that set up the Elis for a score. I thought we did a good job with McLeod. We need a couple to get healthy here and add to the player rotations.

Special Teams: D- Shanked another punt in a big spot and then the other big play of the first half: had one blocked back for a Eli score. Wow! Kick return was nonexistent, we were lucky we didn't send one to the hopsital on a missed blocking assignment. This group has got to start improving field position not giving it away. It's late in the year so its time to make changes here, scheme or players? The Eli's kicker was spot on all day.

Intangibles: Emotion is good, intensity better, getting thrown out is not helpful to effort.

Overall: good effort but some execution errors between the white lines and from the sidelines cost us here. Still you gotta put this one in the category of one that got away. It gets tougher next week at Harvard.

Swami

 
At Mon Nov 03, 11:15:00 AM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with the anonymous poster who suggested using Shane Kelly at quarterback and M.A. Olawale at tailback. Another possibility, of course, is to use them both in the shotgun formation. If you have an outstanding runner like Olawale, you need to find a way to keep him on the field on almost every down. Jake, do you have any idea why we are not using Kelly and Olawale in the same backfield?

 
At Mon Nov 03, 07:40:00 PM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have been screaming to use MA in the same backfield with Kelly all year. Our defense is very close; our offense is OK in spurts; our special teams are just awful. I have suggested using something like the Miami Wildcat on offense. As for the rest of our offensive woes, I am afraid that we need a lot of work on fundamentals. Our season would have looked a lot different if we had been able to eliminate turn-overs. But special teams is infuriating. It is one third of the game, yet we seem to take this aspect of the game for granted. As for next week, I watched some of the Harvard/Dartmouth game; a serious mismatch for Dartmouth but we can make a real statement if we play wiith tenacity and don't make stupid mistakes. I am inclined to think that Rocholl will be a difference maker for us, if he can kick the way he is capable of kicking. And let me say it once more: MA is by far the best running back in the Ivy League!

 
At Tue Nov 04, 05:09:00 AM GMT+7, Blogger dabull said...

Guys, I love M.A. as a running QB and his passing accuracy and decion-making seem improved but that does not translate into being a tailback. It's much different running the ball from the QB position when you drop back and backers are dropping off in coverage. You can spot gaps in the pass rush and be in the secondary pretty quick, but when you're a running back and the D reads hand off, then you're designated to hit a hole that often is not there and you have linebackers and safties flying up to stuff the line gaps. So let's not assume M.A. would be a great runner, in fact looking at him I don't think he's in the kind of condition to do that kind of running l5 to 20 times a game.

 
At Tue Nov 04, 06:43:00 AM GMT+7, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dabull, excellent analysis on QB vs. RB. One other key point. There is not an offense in the league that has their RB's block and pass protect more than ours. They do an excellent job picking up blitzing LB'S and DE's coming off the edge.

In 2007 we had 923 rushing yards. Through 7 games in 2008 we have 921 yards. We are 3rd in the league in rushing offense. The OL play is much improved. Kelly, MA, Rangel and Davis are doing the job.

We need cut down on the turnovers and poor special team play to have a chance.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home